null Skip to main content

Live at Last ⚡ Subscribe to Save on Your Favorite Products!

Debunking the Sublingual Tincture Myth: Understanding the Reality

Debunking the Sublingual Tincture Myth: Understanding the Reality

Posted by Ryan Wade on May 22, 2011

Weighing the Risks Against the Proposed Benefits

Tinctures are alcohol-based herbal extracts, which makes them incredibly effective at administering the phytochemicals present in Pine Pollen.

Sublingual administration of tinctures has gained popularity in recent years, with proponents claiming enhanced absorption and faster effects. This is further compounded by those advocating that Pine Pollen Tincture is best taken sublingually.

Stephan Buhner, the author of Vital Man and The Natural Testosterone Plan, recommends sublingual administration for Pine Pollen Tinctures, arguing that this method allows the tincture to be absorbed directly into the bloodstream, which is beneficial for people with poor digestion. Additionally, some people believe that hormones are better absorbed this way.

However, a closer examination of the science reveals that these claims are based on misunderstandings, and there is serious opposition to sublingual tincture taking. Susan Weed, a respected herbalist and author, argues that the blood vessels under the tongue are too sensitive to handle the high alcohol content in tinctures, and that this method can lead to cell mutation and cancer.

In this article, we will explore the rationale behind sublingual tincture use, review its validity, discuss the potential risks associated with this practice, and emphasize the importance of understanding the basic anatomy of absorption.

Ultimately, it is up to you to decide what works best for you. However, knowledge is key to making an informed decision.

Advocates of Sublingual Tincture Use Claim That:

  • Enhanced absorption: Advocates argue that holding tinctures under the tongue allows for direct absorption into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system and leading to quicker effects.
  • Bioavailability: They suggest that sublingual absorption increases the bioavailability of active compounds in tinctures, maximizing their therapeutic potential. This includes arguing that the naturally occurring phytoandrogens present in Pine Pollen are only bioavailable sublingually.

Understanding the Basics of Anatomy:

  • Epithelial Absorption: The epithelial lining of the digestive system, including the esophagus and stomach, is highly efficient at absorbing alcohol.
  • Gastrointestinal Circulation: Once absorbed, substances travel through the bloodstream, reaching their target organs and systems.
  • Importance of Dosage and Formulation: The potency and dosage of tinctures, as well as the specific formulation of plant compounds, influence the therapeutic effects, rather than the mode of administration.

Debunking the Sublingual Tincture Myth:

  • Alcohol suspensions: Tinctures are alcohol suspensions, with the alcohol acting as the primary solvent for extracting plant compounds. When consumed orally, tinctures are easily absorbed through the epithelial cell lining of the esophagus and stomach, making sublingual administration unnecessary.
  • Absorption mechanisms: The oral mucosa, including the sublingual area, is highly permeable, and absorption of alcohol and other constituents occurs rapidly regardless of the specific administration technique.

Risks of Sublingual Tincture Use:

  • Oral cancer risks: Regular consumption of hard alcohol has been associated with an increased risk of oral cancer. While tinctures may not contain significant amounts of alcohol, any potential risk is magnified for those who frequently use tinctures sublingually.
  • Alcohol mouthwashes and oral cancer: Studies have linked alcohol-based mouthwashes to an increased risk of oral cancer. Similar to the risks associated with hard alcohol consumption, while tinctures are typically used in smaller quantities than mouthwashes, any potential risk is magnified for those who frequently use tinctures sublingually.

Upon researching the matter, I no longer recommend taking sublingual tinctures. Instead, I suggest that you make an informed decision after considering both sides of the issue.

The Bioavailability of Phyto-Androgens:

As mentioned earlier, alcohol passes through the epithelial cell lining of the digestive tract. Proponents of sublingual administration of Pine Pollen Tincture claim that the phyto-androgens in Pine Pollen break down in the digestive tract, specifically in the small intestine. However, tinctures are absorbed through the epithelial cell lining of the mouth, esophagus, and stomach, not the small intestine.

There is no evidence that the phyto-androgens in Pine Pollen are best or only absorbed sublingually. In fact, we receive numerous emails from people who have increased their testosterone levels (confirmed by lab analysis) through the use of our RAW Pine Pollen™ Powder, indicating that the androgen can be digested through the digestive tract.

The Take-A-Way:

The safest way to use tinctures is by diluting them in an ounce or two of water and drinking the mixture. There is no benefit in taking tinctures sublingually by holding them under the tongue, and it is irresponsible to advise people to do so. Tinctures can still readily absorb without damaging the sensitive sublingual tissue.

Tinctures are primarily alcohol suspensions that can easily absorb through the epithelial lining of the esophagus and stomach. They are particularly useful for people with poor digestion because they are alcohol extracts that can be directly absorbed into the system. There is no need to take them sublingually to maximize absorption for people with impaired digestion.

Understanding the basics of anatomy and absorption mechanisms helps dispel the notion that sublingual administration offers superior benefits. Moreover, considering the potential risks, such as oral cancer, associated with regular alcohol exposure, it is crucial to approach tincture consumption with informed decision-making and prioritize overall health and well-being.